****** bet. He'll keep betting on these 'cert', and one of them won't win, it always happens. I'm sure he'd have had it on Tyson vs Douglas, or Joshua vs Ruiz, or one of about 100 examples people could give over the years.
This type off betting is a sure fire way to eventually lose a ton of money.
If you bet $285k on the favorite who is 50-1, why not bet $1mill? Or $5mill? Or even $10mill? Unless those $285k was a large portion of what he has in total. If it was then that just makes him ******. A celeb putting $20mill on a sure bet, it makes sense. But a normal person who has $500k in the bank and bets half of it, is just ******.
So what does that make you? You're just another level below now, criticizing the guy who was critical of this garbage puff piece that comes out after every mismatch fight lately. Did you write this and are personally offended you're not in the running for a Pulitzer Prize?
I'm not criticizing anyone. I'm pointing out the irony in someone on here calling someone else a loser for having that much time on their hands to focus on this subject.
As for the story - I've been tracking absurdly large bets placed on statistical mismatches since the pandemic. There has been enough of a demand on the subject to cover it. Not sure how it qualifies as a puff piece - I'm not glorifying the win (in the ring or at the sportsbook), I'm drawing attention to these bets being placed to begin with.
Again, if the subject doesn't interest people, there are literally thousands of other threads and topics on here to click and debate. To take the time to read, log on to the board and comment (good, bad or otherwise) invalidates any claim that someone else has too much time on their hands, wouldn't you say?
And no, none of these stories are ever filed in my year-end contest submissions. Just stuff for this cesspool of a message board's viewing pleasure.
Comment