Better Defense Spence or Crawford

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GrandpaBernard
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 17156
    • 4,480
    • 2,947
    • 114,399

    #1

    Better Defense Spence or Crawford

    Who gets hit less with hard strikes
  • Monzon99
    Banned
    • Oct 2019
    • 2485
    • 199
    • 13
    • 53,288

    #2
    spenceweather is the far better ducker.

    Comment

    • CLUE
      _________
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2013
      • 1282
      • 144
      • 11
      • 22,743

      #3
      Hard to tell, Crawford has tried fighting defensive and box his last few fights and had C level boxers tagging him from the outside (Dropped, and Busted eye in the other), while Spence is much more aggressive which of course is going to lead to getting tagged.

      Comment

      • pretty ste
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 882
        • 199
        • 326
        • 17,437

        #4
        Crawford has a little bit better defense

        Comment

        • boliodogs
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 33358
          • 824
          • 1,782
          • 309,589

          #5
          Originally posted by Monzon99
          spenceweather is the far better ducker.
          You seem to have trouble getting Spence's name right. It is Spence and he is better than your hero Crawford who DUCKS every good welterweight and fights mediocre welterweights instead. Compare washed up ex champs Brook and Khan to champion Mikey, Champion Porter and legit top contender Garcia and it's plain to see Crawford is the ducker not Spence.

          Comment

          • boliodogs
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2008
            • 33358
            • 824
            • 1,782
            • 309,589

            #6
            Spence has the edge over Crawford on both defense and offense and he averages throwing and landing more punches per round than Crawford.

            Comment

            • sicko
              The Truth Hurts
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2010
              • 34211
              • 2,594
              • 839
              • 151,307

              #7
              Completely Different Styles Defensively!

              Spence Jr has more of a catch and shoot, good high guard, Parrying Punches type of Defense:



              Bud uses his Feet More Defensively, Side Steps and Step/Lean Back type of Defense:



              Hard to say who is "BETTER" both been clipped, it is boxing you're going to get hit. Even Mayweather and Sweet Pea been hit with Big Shots as great as their Defense was

              Comment

              • SplitSecond
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 23151
                • 1,715
                • 1,187
                • 85,044

                #8
                Spence has better fundamentals that make it harder to land big shots on him, but overall he probably gets tagged a bit more. About even. Main difference is Crawford is much more dangerous when you are attacking him (i.e offense as defense) than Spence who you can put in a shell.

                Comment

                • GrandpaBernard
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 17156
                  • 4,480
                  • 2,947
                  • 114,399

                  #9
                  Originally posted by sicko
                  Completely Different Styles Defensively!

                  Spence Jr has more of a catch and shoot, good high guard, Parrying Punches type of Defense:



                  Bud uses his Feet More Defensively, Side Steps and Step/Lean Back type of Defense:



                  Hard to say who is "BETTER" both been clipped, it is boxing you're going to get hit. Even Mayweather and Sweet Pea been hit with Big Shots as great as their Defense was
                  Mannn Spence could give Floyd a hard fight

                  Whereas Terence gets his azz handed to him

                  Crawford would play the boxing game with Floyd, get figured out, and then neutralized into looking for that one big shot

                  Spence steady stream of pressure plus he can box means a good fight with Floyd

                  Comment

                  • Monzon99
                    Banned
                    • Oct 2019
                    • 2485
                    • 199
                    • 13
                    • 53,288

                    #10
                    Originally posted by boliodogs
                    You seem to have trouble getting Spence's name right. It is Spence and he is better than your hero Crawford who DUCKS every good welterweight and fights mediocre welterweights instead. Compare washed up ex champs Brook and Khan to champion Mikey, Champion Porter and legit top contender Garcia and it's plain to see Crawford is the ducker not Spence.
                    If only spenceweather had your confidence.

                    thurman garcia pac spenceweather all avoiding Bud like the plague.

                    Why should porter and haymon be given a payday and opportunity favor from bud and bob? put up spenceweather first and then porter can get on line.

                    garcia is a 5-1 underdog. bud would be the betting favorite vs spenceweather.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP