I think wrestling might be a bigger factor. What does NSB think?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What is more valuable in a clean street fight: good wrestling or good boxing?(pick 1)
Collapse
-
What is more valuable in a clean street fight: good wrestling or good boxing?(pick 1)
25Wrestling is more important than boxing in a street fight.40.00%10Boxing is more important than wrestling in a street fight.60.00%15Tags: None
-
-
It depends on dozens of factors like the setting of the fight, (bar, sidewalk, alleyway, wet ground, dirt, sand etc etc) distance it starts from (nose to nose or say 5 metres back) and also whether alcohol and drugs are a factor (usually are)
Boxing is definitely better for multiple opponents. Wrestling is probably a safer bet if you are very drug and alcohol affected as it is a lot harder to maintain balance in your boxing stance while drunk and on drugs like weed, valium etc)
Safe to say that a highly trained boxer or wrestler of at least over 130-140lbs or so is going to destroy at least 95% ( or so) of regular dudes in a fair one on one fight. Thats not to say the little guys under 130 cant be dangerous too, its just a lot more likely someone with a significant size advantage can be too much for them.
But as anyone who has actually had several streetfights will know, there is way too many variables in a street fight situation to simplify the debate into "all wrestlers beat all boxers" or vice versa.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jcj0427 View Postwhy does street fighting always have to be the standard for something? lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dat Round Doe View PostI agree that a lot of those interested in this are immature, however there are times in everyones life where they have little or no choice but to fight. Especially if you're from a bad area or something. Its always good to know how to defend yourself and interesting to debate whats useful.
Comment
Comment