Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What is more valuable in a clean street fight: good wrestling or good boxing?(pick 1)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What is more valuable in a clean street fight: good wrestling or good boxing?(pick 1)

    I think wrestling might be a bigger factor. What does NSB think?
    25
    Wrestling is more important than boxing in a street fight.
    40.00%
    10
    Boxing is more important than wrestling in a street fight.
    60.00%
    15

  • #2
    In a street fight, boxing would be more beneficial than wrestling. Most people are unskilled slobs; the threat comes from numbers or them doing something underhanded. You're better off dropping them quick and hard.

    Comment


    • #3
      This thread gets made too often. the answer is boxing 90% of the time.

      Comment


      • #4
        Just carry a bunch of cash on you, pay off your attacker. #BetaWay

        Comment


        • #5
          why does street fighting always have to be the standard for something? lol

          Comment


          • #6
            It depends really on the wrestler and the boxer.

            In a street fight, anything can happen. It's never wise to underestimate your opponent

            Comment


            • #7
              It depends on dozens of factors like the setting of the fight, (bar, sidewalk, alleyway, wet ground, dirt, sand etc etc) distance it starts from (nose to nose or say 5 metres back) and also whether alcohol and drugs are a factor (usually are)

              Boxing is definitely better for multiple opponents. Wrestling is probably a safer bet if you are very drug and alcohol affected as it is a lot harder to maintain balance in your boxing stance while drunk and on drugs like weed, valium etc)

              Safe to say that a highly trained boxer or wrestler of at least over 130-140lbs or so is going to destroy at least 95% ( or so) of regular dudes in a fair one on one fight. Thats not to say the little guys under 130 cant be dangerous too, its just a lot more likely someone with a significant size advantage can be too much for them.

              But as anyone who has actually had several streetfights will know, there is way too many variables in a street fight situation to simplify the debate into "all wrestlers beat all boxers" or vice versa.

              Comment


              • #8
                why does street fighting always have to be the standard for something? lol
                Because a lot of the new posters in here are kids or young adults.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by jcj0427 View Post
                  why does street fighting always have to be the standard for something? lol
                  I agree that a lot of those interested in this are immature, however there are times in everyones life where they have little or no choice but to fight. Especially if you're from a bad area or something. Its always good to know how to defend yourself and interesting to debate whats useful.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Dat Round Doe View Post
                    I agree that a lot of those interested in this are immature, however there are times in everyones life where they have little or no choice but to fight. Especially if you're from a bad area or something. Its always good to know how to defend yourself and interesting to debate whats useful.
                    very good point. well taken. i just feel alot of forms of fighting are always compared to each other in terms of how well they do in a street fight. Put it this way, if you know well any form of fighting, chances are youll beat the average joe on the street whose looking for problems.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP