Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: 10 things we learned from Chris Eubank Jnr vs. Conor Benn

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: 10 things we learned from Chris Eubank Jnr vs. Conor Benn

    The 10 biggest takeouts from Chris Eubank Jnr's rousing victory over Conor Benn
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Eubank can no longer make 160 healthily and if the rematch is to be at that weight the British boxing board needs to ensure no rehydration clause on the grounds of fighter safety.
    JeBron Lamez JeBron Lamez likes this.

    Comment


    • #3
      Eubank, All money aint good money. Don't let them kill you with rehydration clause. It's not healthy. He looked bad ! Come on now. Where's his mother, wife or girlfriend? Somebody gotta have common sense.
      JeBron Lamez JeBron Lamez likes this.

      Comment


      • #4
        Like a guy named Pyrus once said. If he wins any more like this he'll be ruined

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Corelone View Post
          Like a guy named Pyrus once said. If he wins any more like this he'll be ruined
          The pedantry residing in my soul compels to me edit your outstanding comment (& it is outstanding) for spelling: Pyrrhus.

          And I, Sir, apologise!​

          Comment


          • #6
            the Romans lost 6,000 men and Pyrrhus 3,500 including many officers.[6] Pyrrhus later famously commented on his victory at Asculum, stating, "If we are victorious in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined".​
            Smash Smash likes this.

            Comment


            • #7
              To the author whoever he is, nobody under the age of 40 in the UK know who Michael Watson is. Certainly not considered the people's champions in the UK. I spat out my cornflakes when I read that.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by tokon View Post
                Eubank can no longer make 160 healthily and if the rematch is to be at that weight the British boxing board needs to ensure no rehydration clause on the grounds of fighter safety.
                Then eubank shouldn't be fighting at 160 and shouldn't be signing contracts at that weight. His last 5 fights were at 160. He's knows he's not good enough at 168.
                tokon tokon Coverdale Coverdale like this.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by MalevolentBite View Post
                  Eubank, All money aint good money. Don't let them kill you with rehydration clause. It's not healthy. He looked bad ! Come on now. Where's his mother, wife or girlfriend? Somebody gotta have common sense.
                  His family are all weirdos, they're not going to be much help. Junior is a weirdo, senior belongs in a hospital, the brother is in prison for serious ***ual offences, the mother got away from the lot of them years ago when she realized they were all nut jobs.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by JeBron Lamez View Post

                    The pedantry residing in my soul compels to me edit your outstanding comment (& it is outstanding) for spelling: Pyrrhus.

                    And I, Sir, apologise!​
                    The English language is a sacred garden.
                    One need never apologize for the appreciation of proper speeling!
                    JeBron Lamez JeBron Lamez likes this.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP