Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[MASTER THREAD] Hearn Admits They Cherry-Picked Bivol

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by War Room View Post

    There is no misinformtion, it's all verbatim ---> V--E--R--B--A--T--I--M!





    You will NOT touch that comment at all, I said you wouldn't and you haven't.

    As far as this video --->





    Then go to 0:58











    Then go to 0:58








    RJJ, Malignaggi, and Tarver DYSAB then ok LMAO.




    Maybe you should start doing everyone a favor and start reading the content. It's a cherry-pick gone wrong. Look at the podcast video of RJJ, Malignaggi, and Tarver called Cherry-Pick Gone Wrong. Jesus!



    Exactly, nailed it.



    Don't foget the clenbuterol!


    Only uneducated people would have thought it was a cherry pick gone wrong aside from pre filled scorecards

    I posted my betslip in a thread i didnt think canelo had a chance with the way bivol handled pascal so easily with his footwork

    Only thing i was concerned about and hence why i didnt bet my life savings was for scorecards filled in the week prior to the fight


    They tried to Rob bivol look at the atlas YouTube video on it he was 100 percent right

    It's just it was that much of a domination they cpuldnt go through with it but early on the scorecards were cooked

    Comment


    • #42

      Originally posted by eco1 View Post

      It was in some of the videos post fight in which he said they knew they would not get the Clenelo fight if they did more than enough to win those fights.
      I posted those in my OP, if you think one is missing let me know so I can add it or better yet, post it for me and I'll add it to the OP. Thanks.

      Originally posted by Stuntman Mike View Post

      Only uneducated people would have thought it was a cherry pick gone wrong aside from pre filled scorecards
      So RJJ, Malignaggi, and Tarver are uneducated in boxing??

      ​​​​​​​

      Floyd is TBE Floyd is TBE eco1 eco1 like this.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by War Room View Post


        I posted those in my OP, if you think one is missing let me know so I can add it or better yet, post it for me and I'll add it to the OP. Thanks.



        So RJJ, Malignaggi, and Tarver are uneducated in boxing??

        ​​​​​​​
        Ite possible they think that little of nelos education and nelo thinks that much of himself that they may have believed canelo thought it was a cherry pick and easily doable but to the trained eye bivol posed major problems and I'm sure the 3 you mentioned there knew it wasn't going to be easy or a cherrypick

        Comment


        • #44
          I have always felt Bivol would beat Canelo.

          BUT I do believe that team Canelo saw Bivol as an easy fight for some reason, based on Bivol`s performances against Richards and Salamov.

          It is not really a rocket science. Canelo is not that good as he wants to believe that he is. And that gifted close loss to Bivol won`t help him to understand the reality.
          Last edited by JakeTheBoxer; 06-12-2022, 10:12 AM.
          eco1 eco1 likes this.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Stuntman Mike View Post

            Ite possible they think that little of nelos education and nelo thinks that much of himself that they may have believed canelo thought it was a cherry pick and easily doable but to the trained eye bivol posed major problems and I'm sure the 3 you mentioned there knew it wasn't going to be easy or a cherrypick
            I understand what you're getting at and there is indeed some wisdom there, but at the end of the day, it was a cherry-pick gone wrong. 19 wins at the pro level, you're just getting out of that green phase and if he was looking flat in his last 2 before, that could be a big sign he wasn't what we thought he was and I have been watching him for a while now. Not new to Bivol.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by War Room View Post

              There is no misinformtion, it's all verbatim ---> V--E--R--B--A--T--I--M!

              As far as this video --->


              Again, you're posting incomplete statements from Hearn.

              "You look at Dmitry Bivol you know against Craig Richards and before that against Castillo, those performances didn't tell you that that form would beat Canelo Alvarez, but when you have a special fighter like Dmitry Bivol they can produce on the night and win those big fights"

              "In his last 2 fights fights there's nothing that showed he could do that, but we knew how good he was"

              Simple question ... why did you cut the bolded words off the ends of those 2 statements from Hearn?

              Another simple question ... when did Hearn tell Bivol he wouldn't have got the Canelo fight if he'd looked better in his previous 2 fights?

              You said Eddie literally told him that, but I can't find it in any of the clips you posted here.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by deathofaclown View Post
                Of course they did, if Bivol was looking like a killer at 175, Canelo wouldn’t have stepped foot back in the division.

                Just like he dropped a 160 belt and ran out of the division to avoid GGG for two years and waited for him to look older before entering 160 again and still couldn’t beat him without crooked judges.

                Still, Canelo is a very good fighter, but as with most top money makers, they are very calculated in their timing of choosing opponents. They can doors that luxury. This isn’t exclusive to Canelo. He isn’t the first and won’t be the last.

                Eric Gómez from Golden Boy is on record saying they didn’t want Canelo fighting an active Saunders between 2015 and 2017, they felt that version of Saunders was way too risky and tricky. Canelo obviously fought him 4 years later when he probably wasn’t at his best anymore after years of poor dedication to the sport and inactivity. Not to say Canelo wouldn’t beat him back then but it just shows you that fighters or their teams are always calculated, taking fights at the right time.

                They thought Bivol was the right opponent because of his previous form, but obviously it was bad judgement.
                Canelo is a B+ fighter that in bold is 100% true.
                The problem is he started believing his own BS and his followers (fans) who doesn't know when they see a good fighter who is protected and a real great one.

                They even said Canelito would school RJJ in his prime (Oh my Lord the nonsense) and destroy Betervieb and Usyk. That is just plain delusional.

                Even an OLD GGG won both of his fights again Clenelo and we all know how they say Golovkin is not even a good fighter.
                So that there is an oxymoron if you can find a word that defines it.

                The problem in this forum is we have fanboys who don't care what their idol, at one point in time, can do to destroy boxing, with their actions.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by kafkod View Post

                  Again, you're posting incomplete statements from Hearn.

                  "You look at Dmitry Bivol you know against Craig Richards and before that against Castillo, those performances didn't tell you that that form would beat Canelo Alvarez, but when you have a special fighter like Dmitry Bivol they can produce on the night and win those big fights"

                  "In his last 2 fights fights there's nothing that showed he could do that, but we knew how good he was"

                  Simple question ... why did you cut the bolded words off the ends of those 2 statements from Hearn?

                  Another simple question ... when did Hearn tell Bivol he wouldn't have got the Canelo fight if he'd looked better in his previous 2 fights?

                  You said Eddie literally told him that, but I can't find it in any of the clips you posted here.
                  Bivol can produce 99 more great fights against Clenelo and next time, if there is a next time and Clenelo finds his balls, Bivol will KO the F midget.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post

                    Again, you're posting incomplete statements from Hearn.

                    "You look at Dmitry Bivol you know against Craig Richards and before that against Castillo, those performances didn't tell you that that form would beat Canelo Alvarez, but when you have a special fighter like Dmitry Bivol they can produce on the night and win those big fights"

                    "In his last 2 fights fights there's nothing that showed he could do that, but we knew how good he was"

                    Simple question ... why did you cut the bolded words off the ends of those 2 statements from Hearn?
                    I added ony what was needed. Look at this statement.

                    I killed her, but I loved her.

                    Does it matter tha he loved her? No, he killed her ---> the damage is done, she's dead. A woman is dead, A stands on it's own without B. B is irrelevant. But let's play your game and you're still going to lose.

                    To put the final nails in your coffin and I'll just add it all because the end reduces you to rubble and ruin --->

                    Originally posted by Eddie Hearn
                    But there was nothing in your last 2 fights, in his last 2 fights, there's nothing that shows he could do that. But we knew how good he was, you always believed in him, but to perform like that, on that stage, was very special. Most fighters can’t produce that when it matters.
                    Originally posted by Vadim Kornilov
                    Sometimes they’re worse.
                    Originally posted by Eddie Hearn
                    Yea of course.
                    Originally posted by Vadim Kornilov
                    Sometimes they’re worse
                    Then Vadim Kornilov speaks to Bivol in native tongue then lmao —>

                    Originally posted by Dmitry Bivol
                    If not my last 2 fights, I didn't get this fight?
                    Originally posted by Eddie Hearn
                    True, true.


                    There it is, posted 3x now but you won't touch that fire.

                    Futhermore --->

                    Saying but we knew how good he was works for my argument on multiple levels but you must have English as your 2nd or 3rd language perhaps?

                    #1
                    • but we knew how good he was ---> WAS

                    is different than --->
                    • but we know how good he is ---> IS

                    Was = PAST TENSE. Learn the language or get out of my thread, is that not reasonable to ask?

                    #2

                    Bivol showed he wasn't (he said WAS) doing that good in his last 2 fights which why he was selected. If he did, he wouldn't have been selected.

                    Originally posted by Dmitry Bivol
                    If not my last 2 fights, I didn't get this fight?
                    Originally posted by Eddie Hearn
                    True, true.
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    Another simple question ... when did Hearn tell Bivol he wouldn't have got the Canelo fight if he'd looked better in his previous 2 fights?

                    You said Eddie literally told him that, but I can't find it in any of the clips you posted here.
                    Originally posted by Dmitry Bivol
                    If not my last 2 fights, I didn't get this fight?
                    Originally posted by Eddie Hearn
                    True, true.
                    Open your hair clogged ears guy!



                    And again --->

                    Originally posted by Chris Mannix
                    Did you think Dmirty Bivol had this type of performance in him?
                    Originally posted by Eddie Hearn
                    Honestly, probably not.

                    You know you look off the back of there’s a lot of fighters Chris that have come off performances you know in the pandemic, through the pandemic, they looked a little bit flat. You look at Dmitry Bivol you know against Craig Richards and before that against Castillo, those performances didn’t tell you that, that form would beat Canelo Alvarez

                    In other words --->


                    Mannix - Do you think he could win.

                    Hearn - Honestly, probably not.
                    Last edited by War Room; 06-12-2022, 12:14 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by War Room View Post

                      There is no misinformtion, it's all verbatim ---> V--E--R--B--A--T--I--M!





                      You will NOT touch that comment at all, I said you wouldn't and you haven't.

                      As far as this video --->





                      Then go to 0:58











                      Then go to 0:58



                      ​​​​​​​




                      RJJ, Malignaggi, and Tarver DYSAB then ok LMAO.




                      Maybe you should start doing everyone a favor and start reading the content. It's a cherry-pick gone wrong. Look at the podcast video of RJJ, Malignaggi, and Tarver called Cherry-Pick Gone Wrong. Jesus!



                      Exactly, nailed it.



                      Don't foget the clenbuterol!


                      Drama queen. You remind me of Nash.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP