Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How did Tommy Morrison contract HIV?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by The_Hamster View Post
    I believe Tommy himself came to the conclusion that he was not really sick with this. And people thought he was crazy to say so.
    Didn't Tommy also believe he could disappear & reappear like f#cking Nightcrawler from the X Men too?

    I think he for sure had it. Once he stopped taking the pills he physically aged very badly & seemed sickly for most of his days. Believe later on he had a sh^tty doctor f#ck him up with a surgery but I kinda wonder if that's a cover for the HIV denial as he got sicker. Either way his health seemed to take a massive downside once he quit taking the HIV meds + if I had a dollar for every boxer who said some test they took was wrong I'd be Warren Buffet rich.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Anthony342 View Post
      If a disease is ***ually transmitted, then it doesn't matter if it's through gay or straight ***. The risk is the same.
      Not true. Certain *** acts have more risk. Why do you think straight women get it & gay women rarely do? An#l *** is the biggest risk act to get it. Gay women generally aren't doing as much an#l sh^t as gay men or even straight women. Also getting nutted in would seem like it enhances the odds of you getting HIV & gay women are only penetrating with toys & worse case fingers.

      The biggest bs ever sold to the public is HIV isn't some gay, specifically gay men, disease. 69% of the new cases each year can be attributed to h#mo***ual male ***. And another 24% can mostly be attributed to bi***ual men having gay *** & then spreading HIV during hetero ***.

      Granted there is some under 10% number that lands into the world of drug use but that almost for sure started with some gay guy with HIV sharing a dirty needle. So it's a gay man disease that's spread to others through *** & drug use with hetero***uals & gay women. That's some unpopular sh^t to say but anyone feel free to look up the stats if they wanna.
      Last edited by Eff Pandas; 12-25-2019, 12:24 AM.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
        Not true. Certain *** acts have more risk. Why do you think straight women get it & gay women rarely do? An#l *** is the biggest risk act to get it. Gay women generally aren't doing as much an#l sh^t as gay men or even straight women. Also getting nutted in would seem like it enhances the odds of you getting HIV & gay women are only penetrating with toys & worse case fingers.

        The biggest bs ever sold to the public is HIV isn't some gay, specifically gay men, disease. 69% of the new cases each year can be attributed to h#mo***ual male ***. And another 24% can mostly be attributed to bi***ual men having gay *** & then spreading HIV during hetero ***.

        Granted there is some under 10% number that lands into the world of drug use but that almost for sure started with some gay guy with HIV sharing a dirty needle. So it's a gay man disease that's spread to others through *** & drug use with hetero***uals & gay women. That's some unpopular sh^t to say but anyone feel free to look up the stats if they wanna.
        If you're the one making the claim, then you should provide the proof. And from a credible source, not from some tin foil hat, conspiracy theory spouting freaks.

        Comment


        • #34
          its because the blood contact - microcuts in **** tissue happen more often.

          Hamster et al, you shouldnt mess about with misinformation. Once you get shyt like this disease, it has major repurcussions even if you do stay healthy. You get ruled out of a lot of jobs for it, for instance.

          Stay safe!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
            Not true. Certain *** acts have more risk. Why do you think straight women get it & gay women rarely do? An#l *** is the biggest risk act to get it. Gay women generally aren't doing as much an#l sh^t as gay men or even straight women. Also getting nutted in would seem like it enhances the odds of you getting HIV & gay women are only penetrating with toys & worse case fingers.

            The biggest bs ever sold to the public is HIV isn't some gay, specifically gay men, disease. 69% of the new cases each year can be attributed to h#mo***ual male ***. And another 24% can mostly be attributed to bi***ual men having gay *** & then spreading HIV during hetero ***.

            Granted there is some under 10% number that lands into the world of drug use but that almost for sure started with some gay guy with HIV sharing a dirty needle. So it's a gay man disease that's spread to others through *** & drug use with hetero***uals & gay women. That's some unpopular sh^t to say but anyone feel free to look up the stats if they wanna.
            Sure **** spreads it more, but you still of the age where bi***uals dont exist?

            Music was greatest in the 80s too.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Anthony342 View Post
              If you're the one making the claim, then you should provide the proof. And from a credible source, not from some tin foil hat, conspiracy theory spouting freaks.
              It's on the CDC website & I thought it was basically common knowledge. It's just non-PC knowledge. There are even stats that say if you are a gay man it's better to be the top vs the bottom with catching HIV. Sh^t someone else already posted the pie chart I took the % from from the info I saw when I was looking it up with lil fanfare.

              https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                First off it's not my pie chart. It was made by the CDC a branch of the Department of Health in the US. If you think they are putting out false information then take it up with them. I don't know why they would want to mislead the public on a
                serious health matter. People in this day and age running around having unprotected *** is crazy and reckless. That includes Morrison.
                - -Never said you compiled the pie, but you posted it as a starting reference, and now that you mentioned the cdc, that's a political org subject to the bipolar state of the union swings of judgements.

                Remember, it was a combo of of the gay crowd blood donors with the medical community that initially spread the inffection to innocents needing blood transfusions.

                This is a culturally and sick country primarily reliant on expensive mutant lab drugs not found in nature, needles, and prohibitory expensive surgery that seizes 30-40% of peoples expenses, the highest by far of the western powers.

                CDC is good for a few things no doubt, but I don't rely on them as experts other than the narrow range they operate in.

                In particular I like how they're trying to get more definitive gun violence reporting, another American #1 category of the western powers.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by DreamFighter View Post
                  Sure **** spreads it more, but you still of the age where bi***uals dont exist?

                  Music was greatest in the 80s too.
                  I mentioned bi***uals in my post you just quoted.

                  Absolutely bi***ual guys are having *** with other men & catching HIV & then spreading it to hetero or bi***ual women. It's a gay male disease doe at the primary source of growth & spreading. It's basically a an#l *** disease at it's core cuz that's a place not built for *** naturally thus it's not as built for intercourse as the ***** is. I don't know if you could prove how often a girl got HIV from a bi***ual guy through an#l *** vs v#ginal *** but I'd bet if you could it'd be a much higher %.

                  I'm not no anti-gay dude up in here like some cats might be. I'm just a facts guy & I don't see the lies about HIV being a everybody disease as 100% legit. And to be clear I'm not saying a guy who doesn't shoot up or doesn't have gay *** can't get HIV I'm just saying it's highly unlikely. Saying HIV isn't primarily a gay man problem is like saying breast cancer isn't primarily a female problem even though some men will get it or that sickle cell isn't primarily a black person problem even though some non-black folks can get it.

                  And this also isn't to say there isn't some tiny minority of times a girl (who most likely acquired HIV from a bi***ual male) spreads it to a hetero male who's never done any gay sh^t or shot up. Cuz that surely has & does happen, but overwhelmingly HIV is a gay male thing.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                    I mentioned bi***uals in my post you just quoted.

                    Absolutely bi***ual guys are having *** with other men & catching HIV & then spreading it to hetero or bi***ual women. It's a gay male disease doe at the primary source of growth & spreading. It's basically a an#l *** disease at it's core cuz that's a place not built for *** naturally thus it's not as built for intercourse as the ***** is. I don't know if you could prove how often a girl got HIV from a bi***ual guy through an#l *** vs v#ginal *** but I'd bet if you could it'd be a much higher %.

                    I'm not no anti-gay dude up in here like some cats might be. I'm just a facts guy & I don't see the lies about HIV being a everybody disease as 100% legit. And to be clear I'm not saying a guy who doesn't shoot up or doesn't have gay *** can't get HIV I'm just saying it's highly unlikely. Saying HIV isn't primarily a gay man problem is like saying breast cancer isn't primarily a female problem even though some men will get it or that sickle cell isn't primarily a black person problem even though some non-black folks can get it.

                    And this also isn't to say there isn't some tiny minority of times a girl (who most likely acquired HIV from a bi***ual male) spreads it to a hetero male who's never done any gay sh^t or shot up. Cuz that surely has & does happen, but overwhelmingly HIV is a gay male thing.
                    cool my mistake, as long as its not labelled a gay disease. It took off amongst gays because being gay was so undercovers in the 80s, society artificially coerced the problem where it didnt ned to be so..

                    not gay btw just health concerned.
                    Last edited by DreamFighter; 12-25-2019, 06:07 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                      It's on the CDC website & I thought it was basically common knowledge. It's just non-PC knowledge. There are even stats that say if you are a gay man it's better to be the top vs the bottom with catching HIV. Sh^t someone else already posted the pie chart I took the % from from the info I saw when I was looking it up with lil fanfare.

                      https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html
                      Okay then. Was that so difficult? And what that link really proves is that with HIV becoming more common among gay people again, that gay people need to learn to wear some f****n protection, geez dude.

                      In the case of Tommy Morrison, he probably just got it from some chick he was ****ing and he didn't bother to put a condom on, just like with Magic Johnson around the same time.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP