I was thinking about this earlier with Nathan Cleverley, who I think would probably be best going to a different trainer.
Of course, there are several instances of boxers who have worked with their fathers and won world titles. But I have to wonder if the majority of them would've been better off if they'd gone in a different direction. Mosley started working with Naazim and made improvements despite being physically past-prime. Roy Jones split from his father while still young and became the best fighter of his generation. Judah stayed with his father and is regarded as someone who did not make the most of his talent.
I can see how it could be the other way though. I'm sure there are boxers and people in other walks of life who do not respect anyone as much as they respect members of their family and therefore are always going to be best motivated by their father/other family members.
I was curious to know of other historical examples and also whether or not people think that most father/son relationships have benefitted or hindered the boxers in question.
Of course, there are several instances of boxers who have worked with their fathers and won world titles. But I have to wonder if the majority of them would've been better off if they'd gone in a different direction. Mosley started working with Naazim and made improvements despite being physically past-prime. Roy Jones split from his father while still young and became the best fighter of his generation. Judah stayed with his father and is regarded as someone who did not make the most of his talent.
I can see how it could be the other way though. I'm sure there are boxers and people in other walks of life who do not respect anyone as much as they respect members of their family and therefore are always going to be best motivated by their father/other family members.
I was curious to know of other historical examples and also whether or not people think that most father/son relationships have benefitted or hindered the boxers in question.
Comment