Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

how come you think cotto could beat canelo when he lost to trout?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • how come you think cotto could beat canelo when he lost to trout?



    cotto need to stay 147 otherwise he would be next zab judah, the gatekeeper.
    Last edited by THE NAMELESS; 11-06-2013, 09:41 PM.

  • #2
    i think they both lost to trout ...

    Comment


    • #3
      I had trout up by a round I think vs canelo. But styles make fights. Trout lefty long and rangy. CAnelo slower boxer puncher

      Comment


      • #4
        who thinks Cotto can beat Alvarez?
        hell, who thinks Cotto can beat anyone serious at JMW?
        Cotto shoulda cashed out when he sold his belt to Floyd
        he's gonna stick around to milk more money only to get hurt
        if he fights Alvarez, he gets stopped
        and if he fights Quillin or Martinez at MW, he just might die

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by THE NAMELESS View Post


          cotto need to stay 147 otherwise he would be next zab judah, the gatekeeper.
          styles. He has a better shot vs Canelo than he did vs Trout.

          Comment


          • #6
            Cotto will get his ass whipped, plain and simple. I'm not sure the payday will be worth seeing him in such a dire state again.

            Comment


            • #7
              While I'm of the opinion that Canelo will dispatch Cotto, he showed remarkable resilience against Mayweather at 154. Floyd would toy with Trout but that is what is called is commonly referred to as triangle theorie. I wanted to call you a derogatory expletive but your a good poster.

              Comment


              • #8
                Triangle theories The best. Styles aren't even remotely the same and Cotto under Roach fights differently then he did under Diaz. Different mindset and gameplan. Canelo can't hang with a boxer puncher like Cotto. He's getting hurt if it happens.

                Comment


                • #9
                  because triangle theories actually mean something in boxing

                  Jermain Taylor beats Bernard Hopkins (twice)
                  Jermain Taylor Loses to Kelly Pavik (twice)
                  Bernard Hopkins beats Kelly Pavlik

                  Miguel Cotto beats Shane Mosley
                  Miguel Cotto QUITS on his knees against Antonio Margarito
                  Shane Mosley beats down Antonio Margarito

                  Marco Antonio Barrera beats Erik Morales (last 2 fights)
                  Marco Antonio Barrera gets DESTROYED against Manny Pacquiao
                  Erik Morales beats Manny Pacquiao in their first fight
                  Last edited by circleinsidebox; 11-06-2013, 10:00 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by El Angel View Post
                    Triangle theories The best. Styles aren't even remotely the same and Cotto under Roach fights differently then he did under Diaz. Different mindset and gameplan. Canelo can't hang with a boxer puncher like Cotto. He's getting hurt if it happens.
                    Canelo would whip Cotto's ass, Cotto always gets whipped when he steps up...Margs, Pacquiao, Mayweather.....and he recently looked dreadful against Trout who he lost 11 rounds to one. But hey, he's a nice guy, maybe the payday will be worth that ass whipping after all.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP